Racial Integrity Act Of 1924 And Mildred Loving - 1479 Words

Just weeks after the happiest day of their lives, Richard and Mildred Loving, a newly wed couple, returned home in hopes of starting a new life, that they now had the joy of sharing with each other. In the middle of one night, they suddenly heard fists pounding at the door followed by loud, deep shouts that made their stomachs drop. They knew trouble had come. Policemen busting violently through the front door, the couple suddenly found themselves in handcuffs and thrown behind the bars of a prison cell. Released soon after, they are told to pack their things and leave the state for the next 25 years, forced to start their newly joined lives away from the place they call home. Richard and Mildred Loving, were arrested for violating the†¦show more content†¦The Duke challenges the idea that Othello cannot be a morally righteous person because of his race. Also, in Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn, by the end of the book, Miss Watson develops more sympathy and consideration towa rds Jim who she once thought of as just a slave. In the final chapter, while talking about Miss Watson, Huck says, â€Å"Old Miss Watson died two months ago, and she was ashamed she was ever going to sell him down the river, and said so; and she set him free in her will† (Twain 319). Miss Watson challenges the status quo by setting Jim free, when previously she had treated him as property. Miss Watson shows care and sympathy for a black slave, which is a foreign concept in the South during this time period. Therefore she is going against the social norms. Overall, in both Othello and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the actions and words of minor characters are used to challenge the status quo of racial norms. Setting in Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn and â€Å"The Meaning of Serena Williams,† is used to convey the message of challenging the social norm of race. In Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn, the setting of the river represents a kind and calm place for Jim and Huck to be friends despite their difference in races. Huck explains the atmosphere of the raft on the river with the King, Duke, Jim,Show MoreRelatedLoving V. Virginia, Introduction, Facts, Legal Background1567 Words   |  7 PagesLoving v. Virginia Interracial marriage: Respecting the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. I. INTRODUCTION This case note will examine the 1967 landmark Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia. The Loving v. Virginia case touched on constitutional principles including equality, federalism, and liberty. Just over 30 years ago, it was a crime for interracial couples in Virginia to marry, or to live as husband and wife. Prior to the 1967 case of Loving v. VirginiaRead MoreRichard Loving, A White Man And Mildred Jeter913 Words   |  4 PagesColumbia, Richard Loving, a white man and Mildred Jeter, a black woman was married. Shortly after the marriage the Loving’s returned to Virginia. Upon returning to Virginia the couple was charged with violating Virginia’s Anti-miscegenation Statue. That bans inter-racial marriages. The Loving’s were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail but the judge offered to suspend their sentence if the Loving’s were to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years. ï‚› Racial integrity Act of 1924 prohibited interracialRead More14th Amendment Of Equal Protection : The 14th Amendment Of Equal Protection721 Words   |  3 Pagesfor a long time ago. Racial unfairness and humanity deprivation was what most colored American people suffered most back in the day. Although the government aimed and worked for equality among every citizen, there is no point to deny that it has failed countless time in the past. However, just because the government failed to acknowledge the rights of colored citizens doesn’t mean that it can stay that way forever and that exactly what the Supreme Court did in the case of Loving V Virginia. The caseRead MoreAmerica s Miscegenation Anxiety And The State Of Virginia1383 Words   |  6 PagesEven through contradictory politics and the use of religion as justification in the formation and adherence to these segregation laws, the resolve of individuals have collectively played a tremendous role in racial equality in all facets of life. Before the Civil War, the Constitution gave rights, individual rights, only against the government. After the Civil War, the 14th Amendment clearly defined national citizenship and prohibited any single state to deprive any person of â€Å"life, liberty or propertyRead MoreLoving vs. Virgina783 Words   |  4 PagesLOVING v. VIRGINIA Can you imagine not being able to share your life with the person you love because of the color of your skin? Well, this was the case for those who resided in Virginia decades ago. Interracial marriages were not allowed in Virginia and sixteen other states due to the adoption of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The sole purpose of this act was to completely prohibit a white person marrying other than another white person. Marriage licenses were not issued until theRead MoreThe Life Of Mildred Delores Jeter And Musiel Byrd Jeter1239 Words   |  5 PagesMildred Delores Jeter was born in Central Point, Virginia on June 22, 1939. Mildred’s parents were Theoliver Jeter and Musiel Byrd Jeter. Mildred Loving was of African American, European and Native American origin, specifically from the Cherokee and Rappahannock tribes. Mildred s family had lived in the area around Central Point, Virginia for a long time, where blacks and whites mixed freely with little racial conflict ev en at the peak of the Jim Crow era. Mildred was a shy woman who became a reluctantRead MoreShould Same Sex Marriage Be Legal?2556 Words   |  11 Pagesthe Virginia s anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional. Therefore the 1883 Pace v. Alabama case was overturned [Ryan, Joe]. This allowed Mildred Delores Loving and Richard Perry Loving, the plaintiffs in the landmark United States Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia, to legally live as an interracial couple in the state of Virginia. The case of Loving v. Virginia was not only a major turning point of the Civil Rights Movement, but an imperative step toward equitable treatment for all AmericansRead MoreThe Lovings v. The State of Virginia913 Words   |  4 Pages Richard and Mildred Loving were prosecuted on charges of violating the Virginia state’s ban on interracial marriages, the 1924 Racial Integrity Act. The Loving’s violated Virginia law when the couple got married in Washington D.C., June 1958. The couple returns to their home in Central Point, Virginia. In the early morning hours of July 11, 1958, the Loving’s were awakened by local county sheriff and deputies, acting on an anonymous tip, burst into their bedroom. â€Å"Who is this woman you’reRead MoreEssay on Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)2059 Words   |  9 Pagesmidnight, Richard Loving a white man and Mildred Loving an African American woman were awakened to the presence of three officers in their bedroom. One of the three officers demanded from Richard to identify the woman next to him. Mildred, full of fear, told the officers that she was his wife, while Richard pointed to the marriage license on the wall. The couple was then charged and l ater found guilty in violation of the states anti-miscegenation statute. Mr. and Mrs. Loving were residents of theRead MoreHow The Virginia State Statue Of Anti Miscegenation And The Fourteenth Amendment Essay2353 Words   |  10 Pagesinformation regarding biracial marriages and segregation laws that were discriminatory in history. I read the short story about the Loving family and their pursuit to the Supreme Court in 1967, I thought of my own family history and realized that my paternal grandparents would’ve been prosecuted had they lived in Virginia or any other state that prohibited bi-racial marriages in the 1900s. My grandfather was an Irish man and my grandmother was a Native American Crow Creek Dakotah/HoChunk woman